History
of the Chaldean Church
A Confusion
of Religion With Ethnicity
By wm. warda
Chaldean Church
rejection of its Assyrian heritage and its leaders' insistence
that they are ethnically Chaldeans is contrary to all historical
facts, reason and logic.
By all accounts
the Chaldean church came into existence in 1551 because of a
dispute in the Assyrian "Church of the East", the dissidents
formed a separate church under the leadership of Yohanna (John)
Sulaga, a monk of Rabban Hormizd located 30 miles north of Nineveh.
This church was recognized by the Roman Catholic church and was
later called Chaldean.
The name Chaldean
had became fashionable among the Christians since the 12th century
AD when some syriac writers such as Basil Bar Shumana came to
believe that the city of Urfa known as Urhay in northern Mesopotamia
was the ancient sumerian city called Ur of Chaldee of the Old
Testament from which Abraham migrated to Cannon. This as we know
is not the case
. (see J.B. Segal, "Edessa 'The
Blessed City' "Oxford 1970, p.3)
John Sulaga was
a member of the "Church of the East", so called "Nestorian",
as were all the people who joined the Chaldean Church in the
next four and a half centuries. They Joined the new church believing
that they were joining a religious denomination and not another
nationality. Joining the Chaldean church did not change the fact
that their heritage was Assyrian and the fact that the Chaldean
church itself was an Assyrian denomination.
In fact Sulaga
was first appointed by the Pope Julious III as patriarch of Mosul
and Ashur which at that time together with Nineveh were known
as the District of Atour (Assyria). The last Patriarch of the
Sulaga line was Simeon XIII in 1670 reverted back to the "Church
of the East" and established a new branch of "Church
of the East" which exists to this day. In other word the
old "Church of the East" and its wayward dissidents
had once again become one. Which clearly disputes the Chaldean
church claim of ethnicity other than Assyrian.
Through the efforts
of the Latin Missionaries beginning in mid 18th century Assyrians
of the Plain of Nineveh were converted to Catholicism and they
were redefined as Chaldeans because Syriac speaking catholic
Church was identified as such to distinguish it from the Church
of the East which was known as Assyrian.
http://www.chaldeansonline.net/church.html see middle of the page under
the heading of "Catholicism
in the Plain of Nineveh "
On July 5, 1830
John Hormizd the last patriarch of the old branch of the Assyrian
"Church of the East", (so called Nestorian) and its
followers in northern Mesopotamia and low lands of Turkey united
with the Chaldean Church and became its patriarch; under the
name "John IX Hormizd, Chaldean patriarch of Babylon".
"Patriarch of Babylon" had been the title of the "Church
of the East Patriarchs" who during the early centuries of
Christianity resided in the twin cities of 'Ctesphone and Salik'
in southern Mesopotamia near Baghdad.
(See Catholic
Encyclopedia under the heading Chaldean rite.)
There is a distinction
between religious belief and nationality. People can change their
religious belief everyday, but it would be impossible to do the
same with their national origin. Believing whether Jesus has
one nature or two in no way a ffects a person's history
or nationality.
Assyrians of
Iran who joined the Chaldean Church during the last two centuries
did so by believing that it was just another Assyrian Church.
They still proudly call themselves Assyrians. Some Assyrians
from Iran also were converted into the Russian Baptist Church,
to my knowledge they have not yet claimed to be Russians, nor
have Assyrians of the presbyterian church pretend to be of European
ancestry. Chaldean church must be the only religious denomination
which requires its members to abdicate their ancestry after they
joined it . It is a shame that the United States Census bureau
has been mislead into believing that it can undermine the concept
of Separation of Church of State with impunity by accepting Chaldeans
as an ethnic minority.
Unfortunately
most members of the Chaldean church refuse to identify themselves
as Assyrians simply because they have been actively discouraged
from doing so by their clergies. Such attempts to disunite us
has weakened both communities and has squandered resources which
could have been used collectively to empower our people, our
shared culture and heritage. Putting three names side by side
separated by slashes will never unite our people. Real unity
will come only when leaders of the Chaldean and the Syrian Orthodox
Church loudly declare our common Assyrian ancestry and ask their
followers to honor it as much as they honor their church.
"In part
I of this article, I presented historical records as to the origin
of the religious name "Chaldean", a name given by the
Catholic Church to its followers in Beth Nahrain as well as those
in Malabar, West India. That the current days "Chaldeans"
are but true descendants of Assyrian of antiquity, a fact that
even the Roman Church agrees with."
|